An Extended Apology to Ang Lee

I am pro-movie critic. I know this goes against the general population. Everyone will just tell you have movie critics hate everything. This is not actually true. And finding good, trustworthy critics is tricky. But in general, they will keep you away from the crap that you thought had an okay trailer and send you towards awesome stuff you didn’t know was out there.

My critics include the NYT folks (I know all 3 of them well enough by now that I know when I’m going to like something a lot more or a lot less than they do), Roger Ebert (who is much less discriminating these days, but still quite useful) and the Filmspotting guys.

I can thank them for sending me to my favorite movie of last year, Dogtooth, which I wouldn’t have seen otherwise. Same goes for my favorite movie the year before, A Simple Man.

I take their opinions and consider them, I don’t just follow blindly.

But sometimes this works against me.

Because, apparently, I am the lone dissenter among all my trusted sources once in a while. If they love something and I hate it, oh well. But what sucks is when they dislike something that it turns out I LOVE because I don’t really get around to watching it.

All this is just a lead-up to the fact that I FINALLY watched Lust, Caution which has been sitting in my Netflix queue about as long as I’ve had a Netflix queue. Last night I thought subtitles were a good idea, since I could keep the sound low-ish while the baby was sleeping.

I never put much of a rush on Lust, Caution because it did well at Cannes, but the US critics seemed to find it nice but responded rather tepidly. Okay, well, not exactly tepidly. They all had to mention all the CRAZY sex scenes. (I was expecting trapezes, the way they talked.) I didn’t even really know the plot.

But I watched it, 2 hours and 30-some-odd minutes, and I loved it.

Critics, you complained it was too long. Are you twelve? Cuz I know it was long, I had to get up twice to puke and I still found the whole movie mesmerizing.

You found it all meandering and such. Fine. Whatever. I never once felt that way. I could’ve watched it another hour.

At least most of you found the actors astonishing, which YES YES THEY WERE SO MUCH. (Um, why did no one give Wei Tang an Oscar??)

And if you really found the sex that distracting… I don’t think you got it.

I found it wonderful. And I hate that I waited so long to see it and I hate that other hoity-toity-film lovers like myself didn’t give it quite as much stock.

This definitely would have been on my 2007 best-of list. (Dare I say it, above critic-darling No Country for Old Men.)

So, my apologies, Lust, Caution, and thank you Ang Lee. I am super-depressed that your next movie is Life of Pi, a book I disliked and quit halfway through. Shoot.

When Bad Movies Happen to Good Books

Sometimes I wonder why anyone adapts a book into a movie. It is so often a failure.

Even when it is a success it can be so… unnecessary. At Book Club when we discussed The Age of Innocence, I wrinkled my nose at the thought of a movie. But I was assured it was quite good. It is quite good. But it is not its own animal, it is so much the book that I didn’t need to watch it. I turned it off after an hour.

An adaptation cannot be too faithful. It must change something, even if it will drive book-lovers crazy.

For example, the film version of The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie is very different from the book in terms of the plot. But the characters are incredibly vivid and the actors bring something into their roles that only makes the book more powerful when you read it. (There is a reason people worship Maggie Smith.)

That is one reason I am hopeful for the new Jane Eyre adaptation, which appears to look at the book through a different lens from what I’ve heard.

Revolutionary Road was a movie I despised. It was quite faithful to the book. The plot was right on. But the book wasn’t really about the plot at all and so the movie was a dismal failure because it lacked everything that made the book special.

A book with a strong presence in the mind of its characters has to be tinkered with on screen. One of the things I felt hurt the Age of Innocence adaptation was its constant narration, giving so much of Wharton herself that I didn’t much see the point of watching when I could just pick up the book instead. Revolutionary Road skipped the narration and felt empty.

It’s better to take a book without so much stream-of-consciousness or inner meditation. Which is why Miss Jean Brodie works, its characters inhabit their inner lives quite strongly. And Miss Brodie herself is always seen through the eyes of her students, giving her an air of mystery in the book and the film. The voice of the book can feel quite plain even though the story does not.

This is one reason why I’d love to see a film version of my favorite novel The Secret History. It has the right kind of storytelling, big on plot and character, but the narrator himself is mostly a cipher. I recently saw a blog post imagining the cast. I find it half brilliant. JGL as Papen? Could be, though I prefer him in stronger roles. (A commenter suggests Andrew Garfield, sounds better to me.) LOVE Wasikowska and Bell as Charles & Camilla. I have never seen their proposed Frances before but he looks the part perfectly.

As for Murphy and Overstreet, right physical idea. Wrong actors. No way the sunny Overstreet could pull off the casually callous Bunny. And Murphy is too old for Henry, though I think he definitely has the chops for it.

I’d prefer Ian Holm as Julian. Or perhaps Frank Langella?

Now I am getting caught up in myself. Sorry, my favorite book, I tend to do that. Moving on!

I was thinking about bad movies because I recently turned on the movie version of Dreamcatcher. I just finished the book. It was okay. I had heard the movie was awful and I was curious. I had no idea how one would film this book, it seemed basically un-filmable. I needed something on in the background while I did things around the house. The credits began to roll and they got my attention. Jason Lee, Timothy Olyphant, Thomas Jane, these were all people I liked. Morgan Freeman? That seemed strange, there was no beatific god-stand-in, meaning he must be playing a villain. And then in the second scene, there he was: Damian Lewis.

I love Damian Lewis. I had no clue who he was until I started watching Life, the brilliant-but-cancelled-because-NBC-had-no-clue-how-to-market-it show. Then I started seeing him everywhere. He was the main character in the amazing miniseries Band of Brothers. He was the main character in the adaptation of The Forsyte Saga. And now here he was in Dreamcatcher… which made no sense.

That is, sadly, the problem with this movie that I encountered first of all. The actors are all totally miscast. Not one of them could pass for a small-town Maine boy. Thomas Jane was supposed to be the cerebral, suicidal shrink? Um… I’ve seen Hung and he’s good and all, but no. Sorry. Putting glasses on Jason Lee didn’t turn him into the slow, dopey one. And Timothy Olyphant is not convincing as a car salesman who’s kind of a loser. Damian Lewis was probably the closest casting of the group, his character, Jonesy, is in many ways the most sensitive character in the book. Lewis is soulful. But he still just didn’t click right.

And that’s where I can’t really blame the actors. The writing. Was. So. Bad. So. Bad. That. I. Wanted. To. Shoot. Myself.

If you wanted to teach a class in bad movie writing, just turn this movie on for 5 minutes. I know King’s dialogue is unique. But especially having just read the book, it was like the

William Goldman had half the screenwriting credit, so I’m assuming he was either hugely worked over or was briefly insane. Though now that I’m looking over his IMDb credits, I realize that everything he worked on was crap after Maverick. What happened?

I do think Under the Dome would make a heckuva miniseries. Got the kind of King plot that would translate well.

But for now I don’t see many book adaptation films on my radar. I tend to skip them unless I hear wonderful things. I’ve been burned too many times.

Not Defeat, Really

Let’s start with Victory. My first YORD book is finished! No, it’s not Anna Karenina, I doubt I could finish it in the scant time I’ve had so far. Instead it’s The Age of Innocence, our book club read. I loved it, really and truly, and it was one of our best book club meetups ever.

The Age of Innocence served not only as a wonderful book but as a reminder of why I set my reading goals for this year. I want to enjoy my reading more. I want more books that make me feel fulfilled and rewarded when I’m done with them. Books that are worthy of my bookshelf. Books that acquaint me with authors that I want to read again.

I will get back into Anna Karenina this week. It’s become increasingly important to see how my supplemental reading fits in. It’s been hard to get back to Anna Karenina when I have nothing else I’m reading that’s working well. I have a couple audiobooks that I use in the car and when I’m walking. But nothing else at the moment.

Another part of my resolution is not reading books that aren’t leaving me feeling rewarded. So today I’m stopping Super Sad True Love Story by Gary Shteyngart. Normally I would have finished the book. I would have seen it through based mostly on what I’d heard and expected. I do this all the time but it hasn’t been so rewarding. I’m really abreast of what’s going on in publishing and literary fiction, but I’m not enjoying my reading as much.

This is hard for me to do. It feels like defeat. But I know it isn’t really. It’s hard not to think that if I just carried on the book would follow through and make it up to me. This is really just a lie I tell myself. This book, for example, is not bad. It’s not that it isn’t well-written or interesting. It is both of those things. It is just not for me, it is not the kind of book I enjoy reading. It is not a “fun” book but a “work” book. And my goal for now is that if anything has to be a “work” book, then I should get something significant out of it. I should, at the very least, feel good about atoning for a serious sin of literary omission. This book isn’t going to do that for me. And so I am done.

So it’s on to the next thing, I do need something to supplement Anna Karenina. Something I can read in longer bursts. So I’m on to Bad Marie by Marcy Dermansky to see if it fits the bill.

Plus I’ll probably pick up a few more graphic novels next time I’m at the library. They’ve been wonderful supplemental reading. I just have to make sure they aren’t taking the place of my big projects, which is very tempting.

The Locked-Room Thriller

Quick break from books.

Eric and I don’t have a lot of time to ourselves and we don’t always have a lot of brain power when we get that time. We often resort to, well, bad movies. Netflix Instant makes it pretty easy.

Recently we’ve watched three in a row (2 on Netflix, 1 elsewhere) that all had the same basic structure based on the old school locked-room mystery. None of them were really mysteries, but they had that same limited location. The locked-room thriller has potential but can also be pretty bad. The most prominent recent example was Open Water, which a lot of people disliked, but which used its concept well. Let’s go over some new offerings from worst to best.

3. Devil, the new Shyamalan-lite flick. The locked-room aspect: some folks trapped in an elevator. The Shyamalan factor, of course, is that one of them is THE DEVIL. This is the big problem with this movie. It could’ve been kind of a cool is-it-or-isn’t-it-supernatural movie. But instead it’s a heavy-handed anvil-fest. You have no doubt that there is some devil that will eventually be revealed, there’s no possible logical explanation for anything that happens, and the characters are all firmly in caricature-mode. There’s even an eye-roll-worthy B-plot about a cop whose wife and kid were killed in a car crash. (Look, M. Night, you only get to use the wife-dies-in-a-car-crash thing once. Move on.) As for the locked-room aspect, they do a decent job keeping it from feeling stagnant or claustrophobic, which is a good and a bad thing. There’s an awful lot of plot OFF the elevator, which takes away from it.

2. Frozen. This one didn’t get much of a theatrical release but there’s been whisperings that it’s worth a watch now that it’s on DVD. The locked-room aspect: 3 friends trapped on a ski lift, a clever new take. There’s more to it, of course, but you don’t want to know too much coming in. This one keeps it simple because the situation itself is pretty fraught. The characters are done in pretty broad strokes, but it’s bearable. This movie is best watched in a group, it’s almost more fun to discuss how you’d handle such a situation yourself than to watch someone else do it. (My thoughts: I would do nothing at all and probably freeze to death.)

1. Exam. I believe this was a straight-to-DVD in the US, but it’s the best of the three by far. This one is the only true locked-room film of the group, there’s nothing you see outside that one room, no other action. The basic plot has 8 applicants for a prestigious job, but what the job is and who it’s for and what kind of world these people live in is only gradually revealed. The exam, of course, is no simple written test. The plot twists are sometimes awkward, the acting is a bit spotty, but it works as a whole. The writing may not be perfect but it’s got the best rhythm and pacing of the bunch.

None of these movies have big budgets, which is the beauty of the locked-room piece. You can do a lot with a little. It depends a lot on the writing, and these three pieces definitely show that. I would love to see more studio movies like this but I wouldn’t count on it.

Checking In

I have to say, 2011 is pretty great so far. It’s very likely that my plan for the year means I won’t break 100 books. It’s nearly 3 weeks in and I’ve only finished 3 books. That puts me on pace for around 50, less than half of previous years. But the whole point of my exercise is to increase quality even if it decreases quantity. In that sense, so far this year is a rousing success.

My first book of the year, If on a winter’s night a traveler by Italo Calvino, was one of the best books I’ve read in ages. This one was solely thanks to my book club, but it definitely qualifies as the kind of book I’m trying to read more often. Aimee Bender’s new book and the massive Vietnam tome Matterhorn were both follow-ups from many of last year’s best-book lists.  Also the kind of book I’m happy to have around.

There’s technically another book, which would put me at 4, but I don’t know how to count comics so I may have to pull them off the list all together.

I have one more book laying around the house, The Metropolis Case, which is very new and could be either brilliant or horrible.  It is due at the library and I haven’t started it yet. I don’t feel too bad about it, though, because this kind of book is one I read a lot. Something new, well enough reviewed. This is apparently no guarantee, since I’m finding my reading so disappointing and it’s built mostly around this kind of book.

Another part of my resolution is to ditch a book I don’t like more easily and to be willing to take a book back if I haven’t started it. So goodbye to that one.

I am by no means getting rid of fluff. Fluff is part of the process. But even fluff has to meet certain standards of quality.

My Big Book is not Proust. I ditched Proust. I have no regrets. Since ditching Proust everything has gone much more smoothly. Instead I am finally reading Anna Karenina. I have no idea how long it will take me and I’m totally okay with that. Next up for book club is The Age of Innocence, which was actually on my list for this year so I’m very excited.

I think this may shape up to be a very good year.

Announcement!

I know no one reads this, but I continue.  If only for myself.

Doing a lot of reading is always a goal of mine.  But I thought I’d get a little more specific this year.  I was disappointed with the quality of much of what I read in 2010 and when I tried to think of what I could do to make 2011 better, I thought of many of the books that have stood out most in the last few years.  They are books I always put off that ended up being spellbinding.  Books like Howards End and Revolutionary Road that were even better than I ever expected.

So I am christening 2011 The Year of Reading Dangerously.  It’s Dangerous for me because I’m going to go really big.  So big I’m kind of worried I would be able to pull it off.  I’m going to constantly read a big classic that I’ve never read/finished.  I’m hoping for big rewards, so I figure I need to go all in.

The ones at the top of my list are Don Quixote, Moby Dick, Middlemarch (or Mill on the Floss), Vanity Fair, some Trollope, Anna Karenina, The Age of Innocence, and the list continues.  I don’t doubt that among them there are some books I will adore body and soul, and I’m determined to put in the effort to find them.

I am starting with Swann’s Way from Remembrance of Things Past by Marcel Proust.  So basically I’m starting with the hardest one.  I have started to realize this week that it may be a very dumb move.  I probably could’ve gone with something easier.  It may take me a LONG TIME to get there.  But go big or go home, right?  If I can get through Proust, I can get through anything.

I was initially thinking of having other rules limiting the reading of anything else but I’ve decided against it.  As long as I keep chugging away (50 pages a week or so sounds good) I’ll finish.  That may mean a few minutes in bed each night, which is how I made it through The Brothers Karamazov 13 years ago.  When I look back at what I read then, I envy my stamina and ambition.  So I’m going to try and bring it back.

So far Proust has had to do a bit of waiting.  I finally cracked it open today for the first time.  (Well, the first time since I tried to read it over 5 years ago…)  I am almost finished with my current book club choice, the astonishing If on a winter’s night a traveler by Italo Calvino, which I love but which can only be read in small bursts, exactly how I plan to read Proust.  Once Calvino is done (tonight, I think) Proust can get his proper place in the sun.  And hopefully I’ll still have the stamina to finish Matterhorn by Karl Marlantes, which is fittingly much like a trek through thick jungle with a machete.  A bleak but beautiful jungle.  I’m just hoping a tiger doesn’t bite into my head before I finish.

So maybe I could have planned January a little better, but December was a bad month for me so starting is about as much as I can do right now.  I look forward to the rest of the year, though.

Best Books of 2010

I had to wait until 2011 to post this list because I wasn’t sure if I would finish anything right before the year ended.  My December has been embarrassingly slow.  I give it the sole blame for ending up with only 101 books this year.  I only read 3 in all of December, so obviously that month didn’t pull its weight.  I did abandon several books, though, so I didn’t read nothing, and there are a few that I’ll finish in January but started in December.

I’ve been using goodreads since September and it’s definitely helped to keep me up to date on what I’ve read and what I thought.  I feel like this year was a bit underwhelming overall, but I did quite enjoy the books that made this list even if there was a much larger contingent of not-up-to-snuff books than usual.  Looking back at my Best Lists from the last 3 years this one is full of worthy competitors, but as a group they would be pummeled by any of the other lists.  I am not sure why it happened but hopefully it’s just a blip and nothing more.

This year’s list is rather short so I think I’m just going to do a traditional Top 10, though I’ve decided that for purposes of list-making, I’m going to rely on my gut reactions to the book and make a list of books that spoke to me.

Honorable mentions:

  • The Violent Bear It Away by Flannery O’Connor.  Best 1st sentence ever?
  • Faithful Place by Tana French, she is amazing, nothing else needs to be said.
  • The Quincunx by Charles Palliser, the tail-end of last year’s gothic phase, a doorstop but a lovable one.
  • Queenpin by Megan Abbott, old-school pulp with a twist.  Love.
  • C by Tom McCarthy, the kind of avant-garde fiction I like.
  • The Magicians by Lev Grossman, which definitely gets the award for Most Improved, my 2nd go-round was significantly better than my 1st for some reason.
  • Major Pettigrew’s Last Stand by Helen Simonsen, that unusual animal, a book you can recommend to your mother and know she’ll love it as much as you did.
  • Horns by Joe Hill, a good idea goes a long way, but good writing helps a lot.  Also in this category is Hill’s graphic novel series Locke & Key, which I’m enjoying.

10.  Under the Dome by Stephen King.  If this was a brain list and not a gut list, King wouldn’t be on it and The Violent Bear It Away by Flannery O’Connor would.  But since this is a gut list I need to be honest and my gut enjoyed King more.  King has been so good lately that it makes me a little sad that he spent so many years writing stuff that wasn’t this good.  Anyone who thinks they know King but hasn’t read anything from Bag of Bones onward (especially the phenomenal Lisey’s Story) has no idea what they’re missing.

9.  What We Talk About When We Talk About Love by Raymond Carver.  Until this summer I thought Raymond Carver and Raymond Chandler were the same person.  I feel very bad about that now.  I don’t know how I made it through so many years of education without a single Carver short story, but somehow it happened.  I am not sure if I will love the rest of Carver as much as I love this collection, but no matter what this will eventually take a place of honor on my bookshelf.  This was also the first thing I read for my new book club, which has been a fantastic experience whether or not I enjoy what we read.  Double win.

8.  The Anthologist by Nicholson Baker.  Every year I try my best to take part in the Tournament of Books.  This was the real winner for me this year, especially since everything I liked was out in the quarters so it was  a lackluster tournament for me.  I usually don’t like plot-less books.  Or books that are written in small increments with regular breaks.  But when each little piece is so delectable, it’s kind of like the book equivalent of eating a box of chocolates.  It’s a joy to take each piece at a time and savor it, though every now and then you may eat several pieces in a row and gorge yourself.

7.  The City & The City by China Mieville.  I would probably read more fantasy/sci-fi if it was this good.  Even if it wasn’t blended with my preferred genre of mystery, like this is.  It is a hard book to get into because the world it introduces is complex, but halfway through I realized that I was fully immersed and loving it.  I didn’t even care much about the mystery anymore because the world itself was so fascinating.  A high compliment indeed.

6.  The Line of Beauty by Alan Hollinghurst.  When this book was big I started reading it and didn’t get more than 5 pages along.  I don’t know what my problem was.  The Thatcherism book is becoming its own genre but this book does it well, as well as getting so much of the class-ism that inhabits the 20th century British oeuvre as well as injecting its own issues of homophobia that make it so relevant.  Romance, politics, scandal, heartbreak, it is a book about everything and it’s fabulous.

5.  Freedom by Jonathan Franzen.  I do not always enjoy the obligatory book of the year.  For example, I really didn’t enjoy last year’s Wolf Hall that much.  And I’m not a particular lover of Franzen.  But I did love Freedom, perhaps not as much as others, and I’m not sure if it qualifies as a masterpiece, but it is bursting with ambition and occasional glory and it’s astoundingly readable.  For someone who often strikes me as rather patronizing, the book was only occasionally so and so often right on the nose instead.

4. An Object of Beauty by Steve Martin.  This book gets a higher placement on a gut list than it would on a more technical list.  While it may have its faults, I enjoyed it so thoroughly that I cannot consider them.  Timing was important, since I’d recently been museum-hopping before reading it and I definitely recommend that.  (A trip to the Isabella Stewart Gardner right before you read it would be particularly smart.)  A lot of people are giving this book flak and I guess I can see where they’re coming from but this one got under my defenses and enchanted me.  If you did not know Steve Martin is a novelist, you really should check him out.

3.  So Much for That by Lionel Shriver.  Apparently this is my favorite book published in 2010, which is a bit of a surprise but I went on my gut reaction.  This book was startling and harrowing and dark and funny.  It was certainly timely, with a serious consideration of health care expenses and their effects in the short- and long-term, but it was rarely preachy.  It is unusual for a book to do such a good job at real conversation.  I dock a few points for the ending, though I see what she was going for.  I’m a confirmed Shriver fan now, I think I’ll read about anything she writes.

2.  The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie by Muriel Spark.  This is one of those soulmate books.  One that was meant for me, just sitting on a shelf waiting for me to find it.  The kind of characters that impress themselves upon you, just like Miss Brodie does to her girls.  I am not sure if it was fortunate or not that I saw the film first.  I may never have read it if I hadn’t seen it.  And the movie diverts significantly from the book.  Ultimately, I don’t think it’s a bad thing that I cannot see Miss Brodie as anything other than Maggie Smith’s version of her.

1.  Empire Falls by Richard Russo.  This was the Year of Russo.  In addition to this, I also read That Old Cape Magic, Bridge of Sighs and Nobody’s Fool, and since I gave the big prize to Empire I’ve removed the rest of them from consideration for this list.  It was an audiobook, as many of my books are, so it took a few weeks to get through it, but they were some very pleasant days.  I spent years thinking Russo wrote sad books about dying mill towns.  The dying mill town bit was right, but the sad is very wrong.  They are sad but they are also the funniest books I’ve ever read, full of effervescent humor and verve.  Even Nobody’s Fool, which was certainly the bleakest, also managed to make me laugh several times on every page.  I have to say that moving to New England was less intimidating since I got so cozy with Russo this year.

Done

I don’t know what has happened.  Somewhere I lost patience with… nearly everything.  I have quit a decent number of tv shows.  It wasn’t that I really loved them, but I was hanging around.  I used them as an amusing distraction.  And now they were no longer fulfilling that duty.  Sadly, this has also extended to books.  I usually read both high and low, with a regular procession of mediocre mysteries and suspense novels.  It’s worked well, giving me things I can quickly plow through and things I work harder on.

Now, though, I’m just done.  I can’t tolerate them anymore.  I quickly ended most of my recent audiobook choices.  I barely BARELY made it through Mockingjay.  (I made it only by compiling my list of complaints.)  And I had to stop The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet’s Nest less than 20 pages in.  (The list of complaints was already far too long.)

Earlier this week I saw both TGWKTHN and Freedom on the Speed Read shelf.  I chose the former and now I am kicking myself.

I really need some good books.  And they are in short supply.  I recently had another all-my-holds-come-in-at-once week.  Didn’t go well.  Left one book unread that I really wanted to read.  Put it back on hold.

But my hold list is unusually short right now.  Finding new and marvelous books is not an easy challenge.

My book club is helpful, though.  I’m glad I waited until now to join one.  And I’m glad I joined this one.  It’s what I always wanted a book group to be.  A mixed group, people of all ages, a nice even split between men and women, strong opinions, and fascinating discussion.  Every book I read with them is a hundred times better after I talk about it with them.  Our recent meeting for The Return of the Native has inspired me to go back and read some of the Hardy novels I never got to.

I’m honestly hoping that this is temporary.  Keeping my fingers crossed.

New Place, New Books

The only way to cope with a big slog is by including plenty of fluff.  I had about a month off of The Executioner’s Song by Norman Mailer, and now I’m back into it with a fresh copy from my new library.  Still have over 200 pages, though.  It is interminable.

Besides that it’s been very light.  I went through a month of hardly any reading.  In June I think I finished 2 books.  Sometimes that happens.  These days I watch nothing and I’m back to heavy reading again.  The other day I was in the middle of only 4 books and felt like it just wasn’t enough.  Yes, I’m nuts.

My new library is wonderful.  Great selection, part of a large network.  The New Books shelf is always well-stocked.  Even better, they have something I’ve never seen before: the Speed Read shelf.  I believe you can’t reserve anything on that shelf, first-come first-serve.  But you only get the book for a week.  It’s an excellent idea and I’ve already used it to get a book I’d waited to get for weeks at my old library.

My fluff has been okay.  I read the new Scott Turow, Innocent.  I wish I could recommend it.  Especially since the last few Turow books I’ve read have really convinced me he’s better than I thought.  I have a theory about it.  The last half of the book is pretty good.  I think that was the starting point in his mind, but to get there in the first half requires extensive suspension of disbelief.  You have to believe that after the events of Presumed Innocent, the protagonist Rusty and his wife are still together years later.  Which I don’t believe at all.  And you have to believe that after being put on trial for murder, Rusty totally got elected to a fancy judge-ship.  Don’t believe that either.

The additional melodrama involved is constantly eye-roll-inducing.  And while the second half with the courtroom stuff is very interesting and much better, it suffers from jumping narrators, which hardly happened at all in the first half of the book.  It gets jittery instead of committing.  And none of the characters come through making much sense.  It’s a real shame; when it comes to legal tricks Turow is right up there with the best of them.  I’m very nitpicky about courtroom scenes in books and his are pretty first rate.  Too bad there’s all the other stuff along with it.

It took me a long time to get through Innocent, mostly because of that dull first half.  It didn’t help that when I had a free moment I would usually pick up Grotesque by Natsuo Kirino instead.  Kirino’s Out is one of my favorite crime novels and it drove me nuts that my old library didn’t have any of her other books.  She’s huge in Japan but getting her stuff translated and brought to the US is a very slow process, I guess.  Grotesque is not as good as Out, they don’t have much in common, really.  I suppose I could say that in many ways Grotesque is not as good as Innocent.  But it’s better where it matters: it’s interesting.  The narrative was nutty, there was a serious lack of subtlety, the unreliable narrator device was pushed to several extremes.  And yet… I really enjoyed reading it.  If there’s one thing I can say about Kirino, she knows how to draw you in and not let you go.  I see that kind of thing mentioned on blurbs all the time but I rarely actually experience it.  She’s really impressive.  She’s certainly not afraid to use completely unsympathetic and often unlikable characters and she pulls it off quite well.

You must have a stomach to get through Kirino, though.  Out is, well, quite graphic and Grotesque is too in many ways.  It’s dark dark dark.  Although I much prefer dark and twisted like Kirino than someone like Chelsea Cain, who is dark the way tv crime shows for old people are dark: purely for shock value.

Speaking of dark and twisted, if you’re looking for the female Chinese-American version of Chuck Palahniuk, look no further than Angela S. Choi and her novel Hello Kitty Must Die.  I don’t like making that comparison.  It isn’t that it’s not apt, it’s just a little too on-the-nose and I’m sure Choi’s had plenty of that.  Then again, she does certainly invite the comparison.  Definitely better than Palahniuk’s recent stuff, more like his old stuff.

If instead you’d like something that’s an homage in the opposite direction you have The Three Weissmans of Westport by Cathleen Schine, which is like Sense and Sensibility except that everyone’s middle-aged.  The romance is often convenient, and sometimes things feel a bit contrived, but I also have to say that in many ways Schine improves on the ending of S&S, which always felt a bit off to me.

One of my recent YA books that I really enjoyed was Incarceron by Catherine Fisher.  Very interesting, very well done, I hope there will be more books in the future.  Fantasy is often not my thing but I think that’s more because it’s usually done badly than any actual problems with the genre itself.

Starting Up Summer

Oh, I am behind.  Since my last post I have more than doubled the number of books read.  I have had many posts I’ve wanted to write and have been too busy to get to them.

So let’s just get those unwritten post ideas out of the way to hit some of the highlights.  (Most of these will be covered in more depth in my Best of the Year So Far list that I’ll be making next month.)

–The Anthologist by Nicholson Baker is exactly the kind of book I would normally skip.  Plot-less, meandering, and about a poet.  Instead it was an absolute joy and I was very sad when it was over.  It was also highly quotable, I wanted to take so many of the sentences and cross-stitch them as samplers.

–I had a post in my head about how to write about big “issues” well vs. badly.  So Much for That by Lionel Shriver is the “well.”  The love-or-hate A Gate at the Stairs by Lorrie Moore is the “badly.”  (Which tells you which camp I fell into.)  There were a few times in Shriver’s big bold novel on health care that I felt a bit alienated because it was just so on-the-nose, but I think she showed exactly how real people’s lives intersect with such massive problems.  I realized I’m just naturally uncomfortable with current events and such in literature, probably since most of what I grew up reading was old.  Shriver got me over it.  Why haven’t more people been talking about this book?

–A Room with a View is perhaps one of the few film adaptations that is possibly a bit better than the novel.  No offense meant to the novel at all.  Howards End, however, is more typical, with the book being vastly superior.

–My YA reads have been scant, but good.  When You Reach Me by Rebecca Stead, and The Graveyard Book by Neil Gaiman are both Newbery-winners, so that shouldn’t surprise me.

–Zoe Heller writes terribly well about terribly unlikable people.  I’m a liberal and The Believers made me hate liberals.

–The Magicians by Lev Grossman is an unusual thing.  While reading it, I started to feel like it was mostly episodic and not creating a full world.  But when finished, and viewed in the whole, it definitely came together.  Unusual to have such a different feeling afterward, the kind of book that would be better the 2nd time.

    But for this post, I’m going to mostly focus on the post I’ve been wanting to write for the past few weeks.  I couldn’t write it until now because I am crazy and have been reading only massively gigantic books.  (I’ve been in the middle of only two recently, a small number for me, and they’re both over 1,000 pages.)

    I propose today what may look like a bizarre double feature of books, a one-two punch that is unlikely but quite effective if you’re looking for some big, fat, immersing and splendid stuff to read this summer.  They are Empire Falls by Richard Russo and Under the Dome by Stephen King.  (Told ya, kind of random.)

    I will probably read a decent number of Russo books this year.  His long long books have usually intimidated me.  And their humdrum plots on small-town life never sounded quite up my alley.  I want to make sure I publicly apologize to Russo because, if Empire Falls is anything like his other books, I had him completely wrong.  It is long, but it is fantastically engrossing.  It is about a small town with quirky characters, but they are human and interesting.  The plot moves forward constantly, and manages to be both surprising and exactly right, an impressive feat.

    As for King, he and I have reconciled recently.  I got a very late start on him, I didn’t read a single book of his until 2004 or so.  And while I found his books to be excellent diversions, they never really satisfied me.  Until Lisey’s Story a few years ago.  Since then I’ve seriously enjoyed his books.  I didn’t have high hopes for Under the Dome, I don’t know why, but it is exactly what his old books were trying to be (like, say, The Stand, which I consider pretty flawed) and never quite managed to be.  It is a bunch of corrosive and explosive material, thrown in a pot, heated to a boil.  It is conflicting personalities, power and corruption, chaos and destruction, with plenty of hope and goodness thrown in.  It may not have the ambitions of Lisey’s Story, but it fulfills its mission admirably.

    I admit I spent the last half of the novel worrying.  It was good.  I couldn’t get enough.  But I was worried it would suffer from one of the problems of many a King novel: a bad ending.  Sometimes he seems to paint himself into a corner and not know how to get out.  Never fear, it didn’t happen.

    These two novels do have similarities.  Both are long.  Both take place in small towns.  Both have lots of characters.  Both are set in Maine.  Both have powerful villains who are often underestimated and sympathetic, troubled heroes.

    Really, though, the reason I recommend them so much as a double feature is the fact that they are both so engrossing.  They stick.  I have had Empire Falls in my head since it ended.  And I’ve been talking about Under the Dome constantly since I started reading it.  (I just finished yesterday.)  They have been such utterly enjoyable experiences that I am just a little hesitant to start something new because I wonder how it could measure up.

    These books have also been helpful for me since I will be moving to the Northeast this month, somewhere I haven’t lived since a stint that ended when I was in preschool.  I got both these books on CD for my long work drives and I now actually recognize the New England accent, something I’ve never done before.  In high school when we put on Carousel, we Western kids were all stymied by the phrase “Ay-uh” which showed up constantly in the script.  I now know how to pronounce it!  And I have now heard New England accents besides the ones from Good Will Hunting!

    So I suggest you try this odd couple.  It has definitely put me in the summer-reading-mood.  I like them big, zippy, snappy, smart, poignant, and just all-around good.  These certainly fit the bill, and like the best double features, they are even more fun put together.

    As for me, I got a new book from the library to try, I just bought a copy of Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell to re-read (only 700-ish pages!), and I am still a good 400 pages or so from finishing my big slog, The Executioner’s Song by Norman Mailer.  My first Mailer, I am a bit slow to conquer that group of big male writers but I’m slowly but surely getting there.  (I’ve started on Roth, Updike, and now with Mailer I wonder who’s next.  Pynchon?  Cheever?)  I am reserving judgment at this point, except to say I have no idea how I lived in Provo (where the book is largely set) for 7 years and never heard anyone mention this book.  How many books are set in Provo, particularly books by one of the most famous writers of the 20th century?  And how many books are set there during the exact time period that my parents were living there?  How have I never heard of this until a few months ago???